China largest market for Panama Papers law firm
More than 16,300 of Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca’s active shell companies were incorporated through its Hong Kong and China offices, 29 percent of the worldwide total, according to the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ), which co-ordinated a year-long investigation into a trove of 11.5 million documents.
The investigation found that relatives of at least eight current or former members of China’s Politburo Standing Committee, the ruling party’s most powerful body, have been implicated in the use of offshore companies.
Such vehicles are not illegal in themselves and can be used for legitimate business needs. But they commonly feature in corruption cases, when they can be used to secretly move ill-gotten gains abroad.
Graft is rife in China, which Transparency International rates in 83rd place out of 168 in its most recent Corruption Perceptions Index.
At the same time growth in the world’s second-largest economy is slowing, and its wealthy have increasingly sought to move funds abroad, but have to contend with Beijing’s strict exchange-control regime.
Under President Xi Jinping, Beijing has launched a much-publicised anti-graft drive, but has not instituted systemic reforms such as public declarations of assets.
Xi’s brother-in-law and family members of two current members of the Politburo Standing Committee (PSC), Zhang Gaoli and Liu Yunshan, have offshore holdings, the ICIJ reported.
Deng Jiagui, the husband of Xi’s sister, was previously a shareholder in three companies: Supreme Victory Enterprises, Wealth Ming International and Best Effect Enterprises, reports said. The companies were closed before Xi took power in 2012.
Relatives of past PSC members Jia Qinglin, once the fourth-ranked leader in China, Li Peng, who led the Tiananmen Square crackdown, Hu Yaobang, ex vice-president Zeng Qinghong, and Tian Jiyun were named by The Guardian, which took part in the investigation.
The documents also named movie star Jackie Chan, billionaire heiress Kelly Zong Fuli, and shopping-mall magnate Shen Guojun.
– ‘Fake reporters’ –
Media in the Communist-ruled country have avoided reporting on the leaks’ Chinese revelations, and social media has been scrubbed of references to them, with foreign news broadcasters such as the BBC blacked out when they report on the Panama Papers.
The Global Times, a newspaper with close links to the ruling party, sought to cast doubt on the documents’ provenance on Thursday.
In Western countries, it said in an editorial, “the politics-business relationship has been largely legalised”, and “politics and the media are both under the control of capital”.
“Whether the journalists investigating the Panama Papers include those serving the US intelligence agencies as fake reporters is a question,” it said, pointing out that few US public figures had been implicated in the revelations.
ICIJ is part of the Center for Public Integrity, a non-profit investigative journalism group that has reported previously on the influence of lobbyists in US politics.
The Global Times did not mention that Chinese politicians were implicated in the documents, focusing instead on revelations involving leaders in Iceland, Ukraine, and Britain, as well as allegations tied to Vladimir Putin.
Users on the microblogging website Weibo have tried to circumvent restrictions by circulating pictures of Chinese-language articles describing the allegations.
Chinese journalists were ordered to delete “all content related to the ‘Panama Papers’ leak case”, according to instructions seen by AFP.
– ‘Economic strength’ –
Mossack Fonseca has offices in eight Chinese cities including Hong Kong, its website showed, more than any other country.
Its locations in China include the major financial centres of Shanghai and Shenzhen, as well as the port cities of Qingdao and Dalian, and lesser-known provincial capitals such as Shandong’s Jinan and Hangzhou in Zhejiang, along with Ningbo, also in the eastern province.
In a 2007 magazine interview, Zhang Xiaodong, described as a partner in its Asia practice, said offshore companies were useful for firms seeking to “avoid” restrictions imposed by countries that “opposed China’s new economic strength”.
Money has long flowed out of the country through methods such as over-invoicing and Macau “junket” services, with Chinese citizens strictly limited in the amount of cash they are allowed to take out of the country every year.
Capital flight has accelerated this year amid fears about the economic outlook and further depreciation in the yuan, driving the government to spend huge sums to stem the outflow.
China’s foreign-exchange reserves dropped to $3.20 trillion at the end of February, data showed — falling more than $300 billion in four months.
In a statement, Mossack Fonseca denied any wrongdoing and said it has always complied with relevant laws and regulations.
No Comments yet