Friday, 19th April 2024
To guardian.ng
Search

A case for raising capacity of non-oil exports

By Guardian Nigeria
02 March 2016   |   3:04 am
A school of thought holds that sustainable development through the non-oil requires that government policies towards non-oil sector production be multidimensional.
Non-oil export

Non-oil export

While attention seems to be shifting to the non-oil sector as alternative source of revenue, following the drop in global oil prices, stakeholders in the sector believe government needs to do more beyond playing lip service to revamping of the sector. FEMI ADEKOYA writes on how to improve capacity of the non-oil sector as a viable income earner for the country.

A school of thought holds that sustainable development through the non-oil requires that government policies towards non-oil sector production be multidimensional as there are several challenges bedevilling the non-oil sector from taking its pride of place in revenue generation for sustainable development.

In other words, there has not been adequate investment in equipment, infrastructures, intellectual capital, human capital and consistent policy framework to spur interest in the sector, which will positively affect the cost of doing business. This has aided the neglect of production in the real sector of the economy, as manufacturers continue to explore importation option to access raw materials that could have been accessed locally.

With government seeking to improve its earnings from the non-oil sector, stakeholders in the sector have suggested enhanced capacity building for exporters and revival of commodity boards to address quality challenges limiting the growth of the sector.

According to the stakeholders, there is also a need to revive incentives for the non-oil sector as part of measures to drive export, adding that quality challenges and losses recorded by farmers could be minimised if the government could buy the excess farm produce from farmers through Commodity Boards to stablise prices and also avoid losses due to the absence of storage facilities to store harvest products.

Indeed, the non-oil sector which showed remarkable growth from $1 billion in 2006 to about $3 billion in 2013 in foreign exchange had equally experienced a decline from 10 per cent in 2014 to 20 per cent in 2015.
Following the inability of Federal Government to revive incentives for non-oil exporters, proceeds from the non-oil sector has continued to witness a southward trend as the nation’s earnings from the sector hits $1.6 billion from $3 billion recorded in 2013.

According to stakeholders in the sector, earnings from non-oil export can easily cross $5 billion this and bring some relief to tackle the foreign exchange crisis prevailing in the economy if suspended incentives are revived and other challenges addressed.

Executive Secretary of the Organised Private Sector Exporters Association (OPEXA), Jaiyeola Olarewaju in a chat with The Guardian, noted that exporters have in the last two years, been sitting on a backlog of over N100 billion worth of unutilized export certificates issued under the seal of the Ministry of Finance, urging government honour its financial commitments in regards to extant law

“It is paradoxical that one sector that had the potential to cushion the commodity shock has been paralysed due to lack of inter-ministerial coordination. Nigeria’s non-oil exports fell from $3billion in 2013 to $1.6 billion in 2015. In 2014, the country had realised $2.7 billion in non-oil exports. In 2015, exports of cocoa, Nigeria’s largest commodity declined by 35 per cent whereas leather exports, which is the main stay of industrial economy in the North plunged by 60 per cent.

“If the EEG policy had been sustained, our non-oil exports today would have easily crossed $5 billion by 2016 and brought some relief to tackle the foreign exchange crisis prevailing in the economy. The officials have been evading the issue by alluding to perceived abuses of the grant which led to its suspension. It is classic case of throwing the baby with the bath water. The exporters relied on the extant policy and repatriated forex through the banks duly verified by the CBN”.

Director/Zonal Controller, Nigerian Export Promotion Council (NEPC), George Enyiekpon stated that the move is to renew focus on finding problems to issues affecting non-oil export.

Enyiekpon noted that the call for revival of incentives in the non-oil export is to further aid competitiveness of goods, adding that efforts are geared at boosting other non-oil exports apart from agricultural products.

Similarly, Managing Director, Multimix Academy, Dr Obiora Madu, stressed the need for improved transparency in the regulatory process, adding that compliance by value-chain operators should be enforced while defaulters should be made to face the liabilities.

“There is need for a new inter-agency strategy as well as a re-assessment of the system of regulation. Ensuring domestic food safety and agricultural health controls promote export market requirements. These are some of the issues hindering Nigeria from improving its earnings from non-oil export.

“On poor earnings, stakeholders should note that value placed on agricultural products is a function of the quality of the product. There has been a steady decline in revenue and foreign exchange earnings due to the poor quality of products being exported. Government needs to coordinate and integrate food control policies to avoid dissenting voices that confuse value-chain operators”, he added.

Executive Director, Nigerian Stored Product Research Institute, Prof. Olufemi Peters urged stakeholders to address issues of post-harvest handling in a bid to reduce heavy metals in products while improving access to market information.

Chairman, Manufacturers of Nigeria Export Group (MANEG), Tunde Oyelola urged government to address challenges in the value-chain adding the problem with product quality borders more on the middlemen who buy the products from farmers and use heavy chemicals for preservation.

Olarewaju further explained that while diversification is being advocated as the need of the hour to generate employment by boosting production in the non-oil sector, government should clear the backlog of unutilised NDCCs and exports made in 2014 and 2015 under the extant policy to sustain about 11 million Nigerians employed directly and indirectly in the non-oil export sector.

He noted that addressing unutilized export certificates could be done by converting them into government bonds with a medium to long term maturity to avoid undue pressure on current government revenue.

“The Ministries of Industry, Trade and Investment as well as Finance should harmonise their position and come up with a sustainable and effective EEG policy to put non-oil exports back on track. Nigeria’s non-oil export sector is still in its infancy and came into mainstream in the last 10 years due to the policies that were put in place that encouraged the sector to invest in agricultural supply chains, export processing factories and overseas marketing.”, he said.

“The root cause of the decline in non-oil exports was a legacy of the past administration inherited by the present government. There is an opportunity to reverse the trend by restoring the policy framework that led to the rapid development of the sector.

“Non-oil exports were boosted by the Export Expansion Grant or EEG policy meant to cushion the cost disadvantages faced by our exporters due to infrastructural deficiencies. It improves the price competitiveness of Nigerian products in the international market. Since 1999, EEG has been given in form of negotiable duty credit certificates (NDCCs). However, the former Minister of Finance arbitrarily suspended the utilisation of the certificates pending a review of the scheme which for the past three years has been languishing due to lack of inter-ministerial coordination”, he added.

Latest monthly economic report released by the CBN provisionally puts non-oil exports at $244 million in the month of November, noting that the month-to-month decline was precipitated by fall in receipts from the food products and minerals sectors. Industrial products, which earned $79 million, accounted for the largest proceeds.

The sector breakdown shows that proceeds from manufactured products, agricultural products and the industrial sub-sector grew by 13.3 percent, 13.5 percent and 38.3 percent, respectively, on a month-to-month basis.

On the other hand, proceeds from food products and minerals decreased by 86.4 percent and 49.2 percent, respectively.
In the month of November, non-oil exports stayed very low at approximately 1 percent of GDP.

The report stated that, “the agriculture and manufacturing sector, which underpinned non-oil exports in November, grew by 2.6 percent yearly and contracted by minus 1.8 percent in third quarter 2015, respectively. The national accounts are due for later this year.”

0 Comments